Event Notification Report for December 12, 2000

                    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
                              Operations Center

                              Event Reports For
                           12/11/2000 - 12/12/2000

                              ** EVENT NUMBERS **

37581  37585  37586  37587  

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Other Nuclear Material                           |Event Number:   37581       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| REP ORG:  TRU-TEC SERVICES, INC.               |NOTIFICATION DATE: 12/08/2000|
|LICENSEE:  TRU-TEC SERVICES, INC.               |NOTIFICATION TIME: 18:47[EST]|
|    CITY:  LA PORTE                 REGION:  4  |EVENT DATE:        12/08/2000|
|  COUNTY:  HARRIS                    STATE:  TX |EVENT TIME:        03:30[CST]|
|LICENSE#:  07-28386-01           AGREEMENT:  Y  |LAST UPDATE DATE:  12/11/2000|
|  DOCKET:                                       |+----------------------------+
|                                                |PERSON          ORGANIZATION |
|                                                |BLAIR SPITZBERG      R4      |
|                                                |PAUL FREDRICKSON     R2      |
+------------------------------------------------+THOMAS ESSIG         NMSS    |
| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  NORMAN LANIER                |CHARLES MILLER       IRO     |
|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  LEIGH TROCINE                |JOHN ROGGE           R1      |
+------------------------------------------------+STAMBAUGH            DOE     |
|EMERGENCY CLASS:          N/A                   |                             |
|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |
|NONR                     OTHER UNSPEC REQMNT    |                             |
|NTRA                     TRANSPORTATION EVENT   |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

                                   EVENT TEXT                                   
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| RECEIPT OF A TRU-TEC SERVICES, INC., CONTAINER OF BROMINE-82 THAT APPEARED   |
| TO HAVE BEEN OPENED AND RE-PACKAGED INCORRECTLY DURING TRANSPORT BETWEEN     |
| TEXAS A&M AND ST. CROIX IN THE VIRGIN ISLANDS                                |
|                                                                              |
| On 12/04/00, Tru-Tec Services, Inc., shipped an empty container from their   |
| facility in La Porte, Texas, to Texas A&M via Acme Trucking.  The container  |
| was similar in shape to a propane tank (but taller).  It was lead filled and |
| weighed between 700 and 750 pounds.  It also had a 3-inch by 3-inch cavity   |
| inside and a lid with a T-bar to hold the lid in place.  Texas A&M loaded    |
| the empty container with bromine-82, and the activity of the bromine-82 at   |
| noon on 12/04/00 was 900 millicuries.  The bromine-82 was double             |
| encapsulated (inside three glass ampoules which were also inside a metal     |
| swagelock container with a screw on cap).  After Texas A&M loaded the        |
| container, Acme Trucking transported the container to Federal Express at     |
| Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas, on 12/04/00.  Apparently, the    |
| container arrived at a Federal Express hub in Memphis, Tennessee, on         |
| 12/05/00, and it remained there until 12/07/00.  On 12/07/00, the shipment   |
| left Memphis, Tennessee, via Federal Express and arrived in Puerto Rico on   |
| the morning of 12/08/00.  It was then transported by 4 Star Air Cargo to St. |
| Croix in the Virgin Islands.  Tru-Tec Services, Inc., received the container |
| between approximately 1600 and 1630 EST on 12/08/00.                         |
|                                                                              |
| Upon arrival in St. Croix, Tru-Tec personnel discovered a problem with the   |
| container.  It appeared that the container had been opened and put back      |
| together incorrectly.  The container's T-bar was missing, and the lid was    |
| upside-down with the bromine-82 on the outside of the container rather than  |
| shielded on the inside of the container.  The bromine-82 appeared to be      |
| intact.  Smear tests were performed using a GM detector, and there was no    |
| evidence of contamination or of a breech in the double encapsulated          |
| material.  Survey readings with the bromine-82 unshielded on the outside of  |
| the package resulted a dose rate of 6 millirem per hour at a distance of 6   |
| feet.  The bromine-82 is currently under control and in the possession of    |
| the Tru-Tec Services, Inc.                                                   |
|                                                                              |
| The bromine-82 was intended for use in tracer studies at chemical plants,    |
| and it was manufactured at Texas A&M.  It was reported that the half life of |
| bromine-82 is 35 hours, and the estimated activity of the material at noon   |
| on 12/08/00 would have been 140 millicuries.  bromine-82 is a strong gamma   |
| emitter.  The Tru-Tec Services, Inc. main office is located in Delaware.     |
|                                                                              |
| The licensee plans to contact the carriers and plans to attempt to trace its |
| path and discover who came into contact with the container.                  |
|                                                                              |
| (Call the NRC operations officer for licensee contact information.)          |
|                                                                              |
| * * *  UPDATE ON 12/11/00 @ 1140 BY BRIAN SMITH(NMSS) TO GOULD  * * *        |
|                                                                              |
| Correction of the dose rate from 6 millirem per hour to 60 millirem per hour |
| at a distance of 6 ft.                                                       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Power Reactor                                    |Event Number:   37585       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FACILITY: BEAVER VALLEY            REGION:  1  |NOTIFICATION DATE: 12/11/2000|
|    UNIT:  [] [2] []                 STATE:  PA |NOTIFICATION TIME: 04:42[EST]|
|   RXTYPE: [1] W-3-LP,[2] W-3-LP                |EVENT DATE:        12/11/2000|
+------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME:        04:05[EST]|
| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  THOMAS                       |LAST UPDATE DATE:  12/11/2000|
|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  CHAUNCEY GOULD               +-----------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------+PERSON          ORGANIZATION |
|EMERGENCY CLASS:          UNU                   |JOHN ROGGE           R1      |
|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |
|ASHU 50.72(b)(1)(i)(A)   PLANT S/D REQD BY TS   |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR|   INIT RX MODE  |CURR PWR|  CURR RX MODE   |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|                                                   |                          |
|2     N          Y       100      Power Operation  |50       Power Operation  |
|                                                   |                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                                   EVENT TEXT                                   
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PLANT ENTERED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REQUIRED SHUTDOWN PRIMARY LEAK         |
| EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE VALUES.                                                  |
|                                                                              |
| At 0320 Unit 2 received indications of a primary leak in containment that    |
| exceeded allowable values in Tech Spec 3.4.6.2. These indications included   |
| containment gas activity alert alarm, Pressurizer level reduction,           |
| Pressurizer spray valve closure and an increase in charging flow. Indicated  |
| charging/letdown mismatch is 7 gpm.  Calculated primary leak rate estimate   |
| based on VCT and Pressurizer level changes was 9.5 gpm at 0400. At 0412 Unit |
| 2 began a plant shutdown at 2% per minute.  This constitutes the initiation  |
| of a plant shutdown required by Tech Specs.  A containment entry is planned  |
| to identify the source of the leak. The entry will be made after the reactor |
| is subcritical.                                                              |
|                                                                              |
| The NRC Resident Inspector will be notified.                                 |
|                                                                              |
|                                                                              |
| * * *  UPDATE ON 12/20/00 @ 0603 BY THOMAS TO GOULD  * * *                   |
|                                                                              |
| Update at 0543: Estimated RCS leak rate based on charging/letdown mismatch   |
| exceeds 10 gpm. An Unusual Event was declared at 0536 due to Unidentified    |
| Leakage exceeding 10 gpm. Current leak rate estimate is between 12 and 20    |
| gpm.  Plant is currently at 22% power.                                       |
|                                                                              |
| The NRC Resident Inspector was notified.   FEMA(Bagwell), RDO(Rogge),        |
| EO(Zwolinski), and IRO(Miller)                                               |
|                                                                              |
| * * * UPDATE ON 12/11/00 @ 0825 * * *                                        |
|                                                                              |
| NRC entered monitoring mode at 0825.                                         |
|                                                                              |
|                                                                              |
| * * * UPDATE ON 12/11/00 @ 1412 PER  RICK HASSELBERG * * *                   |
|                                                                              |
| The plant entered cold shutdown at 1357 and exited the unusual event at      |
| 1405.  The leak rate has been reduced to 5 gpm.  The NRC exited monitoring   |
| mode at 1412.   FEMA (Canupp), R1DO (White) and NRR EO (Tappert) notified.   |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

!!!!!!!!! THIS EVENT HAS BEEN RETRACTED. THIS EVENT HAS BEEN RETRACTED  !!!!!!!
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Power Reactor                                    |Event Number:   37586       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FACILITY: SAN ONOFRE               REGION:  4  |NOTIFICATION DATE: 12/11/2000|
|    UNIT:  [1] [2] []                STATE:  CA |NOTIFICATION TIME: 10:55[EST]|
|   RXTYPE: [1] W-3-LP,[2] CE,[3] CE             |EVENT DATE:        12/11/2000|
+------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME:        06:55[PST]|
| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  TODD COOK                    |LAST UPDATE DATE:  12/11/2000|
|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  STEVE SANDIN                 +-----------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------+PERSON          ORGANIZATION |
|EMERGENCY CLASS:          N/A                   |CHUCK CAIN           R4      |
|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |
|DDDD 73.71               UNSPECIFIED PARAGRAPH  |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR|   INIT RX MODE  |CURR PWR|  CURR RX MODE   |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|1     N          Y       100      Power Operation  |100      Power Operation  |
|2     N          Y       100      Power Operation  |100      Power Operation  |
|                                                   |                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                                   EVENT TEXT                                   
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| SAFEGUARDS SYSTEM DEGRADATION RELATED TO MONITORING PROTECTED AREA BOUNDARY. |
| IMMEDIATE COMPENSATORY MEASURES TAKEN UPON DISCOVERY.  THE LICENSEE WILL     |
| INFORM THE NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR.  CONTACT THE HEADQUARTERS OPERATIONS      |
| OFFICER FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.                                              |
|                                                                              |
| * * * UPDATE AT 1543 ON 12/11/00 AT 1543 BY PLUMLEE, RECEIVED BY WEAVER * *  |
| *                                                                            |
|                                                                              |
| The licensee requested this event be retracted.  The event is an example     |
| listed in Generic Letter 91-03 as a loggable event and hence should not have |
| been reported.  The licensee will notify the NRC resident inspector.  The    |
| Operations Officer notified the R4DO (Cain).                                 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|General Information or Other                     |Event Number:   37587       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| REP ORG:  WA DIVISION OF RADIATION PROTECTION  |NOTIFICATION DATE: 12/11/2000|
|LICENSEE:  TRANSALTA CENTRALIA MINING LLC       |NOTIFICATION TIME: 19:00[EST]|
|    CITY:  CENTRALIA                REGION:  4  |EVENT DATE:        11/21/2000|
|  COUNTY:                            STATE:  WA |EVENT TIME:        12:00[PST]|
|LICENSE#:  WN-I0241-1            AGREEMENT:  Y  |LAST UPDATE DATE:  12/11/2000|
|  DOCKET:                                       |+----------------------------+
|                                                |PERSON          ORGANIZATION |
|                                                |CHUCK CAIN           R4      |
|                                                |THOMAS ESSIG         NMSS    |
+------------------------------------------------+                             |
| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  TERRY FRAZEE                 |                             |
|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  DOUG WEAVER                  |                             |
+------------------------------------------------+                             |
|EMERGENCY CLASS:          N/A                   |                             |
|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |
|NAGR                     AGREEMENT STATE        |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

                                   EVENT TEXT                                   
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| AGREEMENT STATE REPORT                                                       |
|                                                                              |
| This is notification of an event in Washington state as reported to the WA   |
| Department of                                                                |
|                                                                              |
| Health Division of Radiation Protection.                                     |
|                                                                              |
| STATUS: new (related to events #WA-00-054 and #WA-00-046)                    |
|                                                                              |
| Licensee: Transalta Centralia Mining LLC                                     |
| City and state: Centralia, WA                                                |
| License number: WN-I0241-1                                                   |
| Type of license: Fixed Gauge                                                 |
|                                                                              |
| Date of event: November 21 & 23, 2000 Location of Event; Centralia, WA       |
| ABSTRACT: (where, when, how, why; cause. contributing factors, corrective    |
| actions, consequences, DOH on-site investigation; media attention) The       |
| licensee notified the WA Department of Health, Division of Radiation         |
| Protection, that replacement rods (installed after source rod failures       |
| documented in Washington event reports #WA-00-046 and WA-00-054) had failed  |
| on November 21 and November 22.                                              |
|                                                                              |
| As reported previously, the Ronan Engineering Company Model SA-4 gauging     |
| device (containing up to 74 gigabecquerels of cesium-137 in an Amersham      |
| Model CDC.711M source) is operated by lowering the source at the end of an   |
| approximately six foot source rod into a dry well. The gauge is removed from |
| service by pulling up on the source rod until the source enters the shielded |
| body of the gauge. The source rod was originally constructed in several      |
| screw-together  sections. Failure number 1 (September 13) was the apparent   |
| result of mechanical vibration loosening the upper screw joint until it came |
| apart as the source rod was being lifted. Failure number 2 (October 5) was   |
| presumed to be metal fatigue in that the male threaded portion of the lower  |
| screw joint snapped off from the rod as it was being lifted. Since an exact  |
| replacement rod was no longer available from Ronan, the actual replacement   |
| consisted of two rod sections connected at each joint by a spring-loaded     |
| brass pin and a short manufactured adapter that was tooled for the pin       |
| connector at one end and a threaded male connector at the other.             |
|                                                                              |
| Failure number 3 (November 21) and failure number 4 (November 23) also       |
| occurred while lifting the source rod. In both instances, the lower          |
| pin-connected joint failed apparently as a result of the increased tension   |
| as the source enters the shield overcoming the spring tension on the brass   |
| pin, thus  'popping' the connector loose. After the second failure of this   |
| type, the gauge was taken out of service and the manufacturer requested to   |
| provide an exact replacement rod. The  'old style'  screw-together sections  |
| were installed December 7. The  'new'  pin-connected rods provided for the   |
| other three gauges had not been installed because no problems had occurred.  |
| The licensee plans to replace all four gauges by the end of 2001 when new    |
| process equipment is installed.                                              |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+


Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021